Archives > Plano Star-courier > News
Print
E-mail
Comment
Rate
RSS
Share
DART to test-pilot integrated corridor plan on U.S. 75
By Conner Hammett, chammett@starlocalnews.com
For most North Texans, it is not unusual to pull on to U.S. 75 only to find oneself stuck in a traffic jam spanning two or more miles.
But when Koorosh Olyai, DART's vice president of mobility programs, shares this with out-of-state friends and colleagues, it comes as something of a shock.
"To someone who's not here, it's impossible," he said, "[but] it's a daily routine."
Set to launch in the spring along U.S. 75 from Dallas to Plano, the pilot program seeks to coordinate the disparate agencies that control freeways, arterials and public transit facilities. These agencies have traditionally managed their respective facilities independent of one another and had a limited capacity for information-sharing, Olyai said.
Dallas-Fort Worth is one of only two metropolitan areas -- the other being San Diego -- to be selected by the U.S. Department of Transportation for a first-of-its-kind test run of the integrated corridor concept. The overall plan has been developed and overseen by DART, which submitted an operations proposal to USDOT in 2007.
The program works like this: real-time data pertaining to state-owned freeways, city-owned arterials and public transportation systems is gathered and entered into a centralized computer system. This information could drive one of hundreds of diversion strategies designed to keep travelers moving in the event of an incident or congestion.
For example, a minor incident on the freeway may prompt a message to appear on TxDOT's electronic messaging signs, instructing vehicles to divert to the service road and re-enter the freeway at a specific onramp with an estimated trip time. A more serious incident or lane-closing construction may divert drivers to K Avenue or a nearby DART Red Line park-and-ride station. Traffic signal timing may also be adjusted along the way based on the calculated traffic load and wait time, Olyai said.
Some of this information, in addition to trip planning features, will be available to the public in the form of Texas' first-ever 511 service, which will be available to commuters via telephone, web, mobile and social media applications after the project launch.
"Let's say you live in Plano and work in downtown Dallas," Olyai said. "If you register for a profile on it, once you call, it recognizes who you are ... It also alerts you, in real time, rather than you going out and being stuck."
Data used in this process will be gathered using TxDOT's existing U.S. 75 traffic counters and DART's rail car passenger counters. More than 40 Bluetooth traffic sensors will provide travel times and speeds from the freeway's nearest major arterial, Highway 5.
Methodology to monitor and publish available lot capacity at park-and-ride stations is also in the works, said Lloyd Neal, traffic engineering manager for the city of Plano.
"The need has been on the table for many, many years. The technology just hasn't caught up with it," he said. "Now the technology has caught up with the use of Bluetooth, in-car sensors and algorithms to allow us to program signal controllers. Long-term models allow us to predict 30 minutes in the future what we expect traffic patterns to be. We can now program our signals to manage that."
A 2010 USDOT simulation using DART data projected a cost-benefit ratio of 20:1 over 10 years for the DFW area, with a $264 million reduction in traffic accidents, fuel consumption and emissions compared to a $14 million 10-year cost.
"This is not a capital-intensive program," Olyai said. "You build a mile of light rail, you pay $80 million a mile. You build a mile of freeway, you pay $20-$30 million a mile. But this is a very, very inexpensive [way] of getting better use of existing assets."
USDOT is providing $5.31 million for the program, with an additional $3 million coming from the local project partners. Another $900,000 in federal funding has also been secured.
The following are comments from the readers.
In no way do they represent the view of Starlocalnews.com
In no way do they represent the view of Starlocalnews.com
controverse wrote on Jan 2, 2013 12:19 PM:
" this is an experiment. we dont need to read boards to know there is an accident, there are too many cars on the highway, we need to find solutions to move the cars off, rail, HOV, etc. this is just more smokescreens for what 900k$ would really solve. Not sure how rail costs $80 million a mile, when concrete costs more than $30 million a mile when it exceeds 6 lanes wide both directions (just to buy the necessary ROWays. then we need to use a different rail. It costs Europe 16.5 million EU a mile to run their rail and they have less land. "
You must register with a valid email to post comments.
Only your Member ID will be posted with the comments.
Only your Member ID will be posted with the comments.
Registered users sign in here:
Become a Registered User
- Return to: News «
- Home «
- Top of Page ^
The best way to keep traffic flowing during minor accidents is to keep fire trucks away from unnecessarily blocking lanes. There is no need for this obstruction. "